Send Help (2026) Parents Guide

Send Help is Rated R by Motion Picture Rating (MPA) for strong/bloody violence and language.

We’ve all seen the story before: strangers stranded, no rescue coming, survival reduced to instinct and stubbornness. It’s a premise so familiar it almost dares you to disengage. But then you start to notice the angle of the camera, the rhythm of the cuts, the way discomfort is stretched just a little too long to be accidental and you realize this isn’t just another castaway thriller. This is a Sam Raimi survival movie. And that changes everything.

Send Help stars Rachel McAdams and Dylan O’Brien, with Raimi the filmmaker behind The Evil Dead, Evil Dead II, Army of Darkness, Drag Me to Hell, and the Tobey Maguire Spider-Man trilogy  bringing his unmistakable fingerprints to what could have been a modest, contained two-hander. O’Brien plays the newly appointed CEO of a company where McAdams’s character works. He’s slick, self-satisfied, casually condescending the kind of corporate climber who mistakes authority for character. McAdams is the employee beneath him: hyper-competent, painfully awkward, socially uncomfortable in a way that feels both hard to watch and precisely observed.

Their relationship begins in the familiar ecosystem of office politics. Then comes the crash.

They’re traveling on his private plane for a business trip when disaster strikes. The aircraft goes down, and suddenly they are alone together on a remote island, the only survivors. The hierarchy that once governed them doesn’t vanish instantly that’s part of the tension. He still tries to assert dominance, still speaks as though performance reviews and boardroom dynamics matter here. But reality intrudes quickly: he’s badly injured, barely mobile. She, on the other hand, turns out to have genuine survival skills, fueled in part by a personal obsession with the TV show Survivor. (There’s even a sly aside about being surprised the show is still on the air a small, wry detail that grounds the character in a recognizable, slightly cynical worldview.)

Highly Recommended: The Invite (2026) Parents Guide

What unfolds is a psychological tug-of-war disguised as a survival thriller: a shifting battle over who leads, who depends on whom, and who truly understands the stakes now that all formal structures have collapsed. It’s a sharp premise, and the film knows it.

McAdams and O’Brien are both excellent not in a showy way, but in the way that convinces you these people existed long before the opening frame. Their dynamic is the engine of the movie. “Chemistry” feels like the wrong word, though, because that usually implies romance or charm. What they share here is friction. Power struggle. Ego versus competence. Their connection crackles because they are constantly trying to outmaneuver each other emotionally, sometimes even physically. You feel the push and pull in every exchange.

O’Brien’s performance walks a tricky line. His character’s laugh, in particular, is borderline obnoxious big, theatrical, a little too loud for the situation. At first it feels like overacting. But then you start to understand the intention: that laugh is a mask, a defense mechanism, a signal flare announcing exactly the kind of man he is. Once you tune into that, it becomes an effective, if abrasive, character detail rather than a flaw.

And then there’s the third lead performance, the one that isn’t credited on IMDb but is impossible to miss: Sam Raimi himself.

Some directors disappear behind the material. You could watch their films blind and never guess who made them. Raimi is not that kind of filmmaker. If you didn’t know he directed Send Help, you might still find yourself halfway through asking, “Wait… is this a Raimi joint?” The tonal shifts, the aggressive camera angles, the willingness to push moments into discomfort rather than playing them safe it all feels deeply, unapologetically him.

There’s a scene where one character is pinned down while another vomits onto them from above. It’s grotesque, uncomfortable, borderline absurd and unmistakably Raimi. These are the kinds of flourishes that recall his horror roots, the mischievous cruelty of Evil Dead II, the heightened bodily chaos of Drag Me to Hell. Even when the film isn’t overtly violent, there’s a sense that Raimi is always tempted to dial things up just a notch beyond what’s “necessary,” as if to say: if the audience isn’t squirming a little, why bother?

The violence, when it arrives, doesn’t feel obligatory. It feels curated. There’s a particularly bloody moment during a hunting sequence that could have been staged plainly functional, forgettable. Instead, Raimi leans into the mess of it. The physicality. The discomfort. The reminder that survival isn’t noble; it’s ugly, visceral, and sometimes hard to watch. You can feel the director’s philosophy at work: tension should be felt in the body, not just understood intellectually. What surprised me most, though, was how funny the film often is.

Highly Recommended: In Cold Light (2025) Parents Guide

That sentence might make you nervous in 2026, conditioned as we are by a decade of MCU-style quip machines. “Funnier than expected” has become code for tone-killing, self-aware snark. That’s not what’s happening here. The humor in Send Help grows organically out of character and situation. It comes from O’Brien’s passive-aggressive remarks, from the absurdity of their shifting power dynamics, from the uncomfortable pauses in conversations where neither knows how to proceed. It’s the kind of humor that makes you laugh and then feel slightly guilty for laughing because the situation is, objectively, awful.

And the laughter doesn’t undermine the tension. If anything, it deepens it. The audience I watched it with laughed more than I anticipated and crucially, those laughs never broke the film’s spell. They were part of the rhythm, not a distraction from it.

There is one sequence in the film that strongly evoked another movie for me a specific scene, a specific narrative turn but naming the comparison would edge too close to spoiler territory. It’s one of those frustrating critic moments where you want to say, “Trust me, if you know, you know,” and move on. So I will.

The ending, however, is harder to tiptoe around emotionally. I won’t spoil it, but I will say this: the film’s final minutes pivot toward a direction that feels bold, unsettling, and dramatically interesting… and then, at the very end, it undercuts itself. Not catastrophically. Not enough to ruin the experience. But enough that you feel a little betrayed. I found myself thinking, Really? That’s the choice you made? There are unanswered questions. There’s a tonal decision that feels more convenient than honest. It doesn’t break the film, but it does leave a faint aftertaste of frustration.

Still, taken as a whole, Send Help is a smart, engaging thriller that benefits enormously from Raimi’s involvement. Without him, it might have been another competent but forgettable survival story. With him, it becomes something stranger, sharper, and more alive. He takes a premise we think we know and injects it with personality, discomfort, and cinematic mischief. You can feel the filmmaker behind the camera, shaping the experience rather than simply recording it.

And perhaps most importantly: it’s entertaining. Genuinely so. I had a great time watching it, fully engaged, no ironic distance required. After a stretch of films that felt like they were just filling release slots, it’s refreshing to see something that actually feels made with intention, with voice, with attitude.

So yes, we’ve been on this island before.
But we haven’t been here with Sam Raimi.
And that makes all the difference.

Send Help (2026) Parents Guide

Violence & Intensity: There are scenes involving physical injury, blood, and survival-driven brutality that feel deliberately heightened, in the spirit of Sam Raimi’s sensibilities not horror-movie excess, but more than enough to make you squirm. One hunting-related sequence in particular is notably bloody and prolonged, shot in a way that emphasizes discomfort rather than spectacle. The intensity also comes from psychological tension: power struggles, emotional manipulation, and the stress of isolation create a sustained sense of unease.

Language: Expect frequent use of the F-word and other common R-rated profanity. The tone of the language is hostile, sarcastic, and sometimes passive-aggressive rather than jokey. Characters use sharp verbal jabs to wound each other emotionally, which can feel just as intense as the physical moments. There are no notable slurs used in a hateful context, but the dialogue is raw and unfiltered, true to the characters’ emotional states.

Sexual Content / Nudity: There is minimal sexual content. No explicit sex scenes are present. Any references to sexuality are brief and largely conversational rather than visual. There is no lingering nudity designed for titillation. Parents concerned primarily with sexual material will likely find this to be the least problematic category.

Drugs, Alcohol & Smoking: Very limited substance use. There are brief references to alcohol and possibly short moments where characters drink, but it is not a focal point of the story. No glamorized drug use. The survival context makes substances feel irrelevant to the narrative rather than normalized or promoted.

Age Recommendations: This is firmly not a film for children. The emotional tone, intensity, and bursts of bloody violence make it inappropriate for most viewers under 16–17, depending on maturity.

Recommended: Mercy (2026) Parents Guide